CEO
Which workflow, if improved, would change speed, operating leverage, service quality, or strategic focus?
AI readiness checklist
Check whether your company is ready to turn AI pressure into a buildable project. The key is knowing which workflow matters, who owns it, which data can be used, and what result would justify moving from MVP to production.
Readiness signals
Executive checklist
Which workflow, if improved, would change speed, operating leverage, service quality, or strategic focus?
Which manual reporting, pricing, forecasting, or anomaly loop has enough value to justify funding?
Which systems, permissions, evaluations, logs, and ownership model are needed to run this safely?
What would make the AI system meaningfully better than the current process in daily work?
Implementation checklist
Which part of the company owns the workflow: finance, operations, legal, sales, project delivery, support, product, or compliance?
What repeated process, decision loop, knowledge task, reporting flow, or approval path should AI improve?
Where is the work slow, manual, expensive, duplicated, hard to search, or dependent on a few experts?
Which documents, databases, dashboards, ERP, CRM, SharePoint, tickets, email, or internal tools are involved?
Who will use the first MVP, how often, and what level of accuracy or review do they need?
Which permissions, GDPR constraints, hosting requirements, confidential data, and audit needs shape the system?
Is the likely system a RAG assistant, agentic workflow, finance dashboard, Company Brain layer, or AI-native internal tool?
What proof would justify moving forward: faster cycle time, better decisions, fewer manual steps, adoption, or lower reporting drag?
How many users, how much concurrent usage, what data volume, and what production availability should be expected?
If the MVP works, what should happen next: production hardening, broader rollout, more workflows, or a reusable AI platform?
Choose the right route
The objective is to reduce ambiguity before any large AI transformation commitment. The right first step depends on how many answers are already clear and how quickly the company needs a working proof.
Start with an AI opportunity assessment to find the workflow and map the data landscape.
Use an AI integration roadmap to define architecture, security, governance, and delivery sequence.
Build an MVP or PoC around one workflow with realistic users, constraints, and measurement.
Harden the system into production infrastructure, a Company Brain layer, or AI-native internal software.
Common gaps
Find the executive or operating sponsor before starting a build. AI projects drift when nobody owns the workflow.
Rank opportunities by value, feasibility, data readiness, risk, and delivery speed before choosing the MVP.
Use discovery to confirm which sources are usable and where synthetic or sampled data is enough for early validation.
Bring permissions, hosting, privacy, review, and audit constraints into architecture before the first prototype scales.
AI readiness questions
A company is ready when at least one workflow has a clear business owner, accessible data or documents, defined users, measurable value, security constraints, and a path from MVP to production.
The company should identify the workflow, target users, data sources, success metric, permissions, expected usage, reviewer process, and the decision criteria for scaling.
Perfect data is not required, but the first AI workflow needs enough usable data or documents to test value. Data gaps can become part of the roadmap if the business case is strong enough.
The checklist is strongest when answered by a business sponsor, a technical owner, and the people closest to the workflow. CEO, CFO, CTO, operations, finance, data, security, and compliance may be involved.
Readiness next step
Share the business area, workflow, current friction, data sources, expected users, security constraints, timeline, and what the first AI MVP should prove.