AI consulting process

Start narrow, prove value, then scale the AI system.

Ferre Torres B.V. uses a practical AI consulting process for companies: choose one workflow, validate the business and technical assumptions, build a useful MVP or PoC, then scale only what proves value.

  • Workflow first
  • MVP proof
  • Production architecture
  • Governed scale

Process map

A clean path from first conversation to scale decision.

The process is designed for CEOs, CFOs, CTOs, and operating leaders who need a serious implementation path without committing to a vague company-wide AI transformation before evidence exists.

  1. Brief

    Capture the workflow, buyer role, data sources, target users, timeline, and result that should improve.

  2. Assess

    Rank feasibility, value, risk, data readiness, and stakeholder ownership before choosing the first build.

  3. Roadmap

    Define the RAG, agent, dashboard, Company Brain, governance, and production sequence.

  4. MVP

    Ship one narrow working system with realistic data, users, constraints, and measurement.

  5. Scale

    Harden the validated workflow into reusable AI infrastructure or internal AI-native software.

First call inputs

The first discussion should be concrete enough to build from.

  • Business area and owner: CEO, CFO, CTO, operations, finance, product, legal, compliance, or delivery.
  • Workflow: the repeated manual work, reporting loop, knowledge bottleneck, approval path, or decision process.
  • Data and tools: documents, databases, ERP, CRM, SharePoint, Google Drive, PowerBI, Tableau, tickets, email, or custom systems.
  • Proof target: time saved, reporting latency, accuracy, adoption, margin insight, response time, quality lift, or production readiness.

Decision-maker questions

The process answers the questions each buyer needs before funding scale.

CEO

Which AI workflow creates visible operating leverage and can become infrastructure?

CFO

Which result justifies investment, and how will value be measured?

CTO

Can the MVP be built with secure data access, evaluations, monitoring, and ownership?

Users

Does the workflow actually become faster, clearer, or more reliable than the current process?

Useful outputs

Each phase should leave a decision artifact, not only discussion notes.

Opportunity map

Prioritized AI workflows with value, feasibility, data readiness, risk, and ownership.

Buildable roadmap

Sequence for Company Brain, RAG, agents, dashboards, governance, and production rollout.

MVP scope

Users, data sources, interface, AI components, success metric, timeline, and scale gate.

Architecture view

Permissions, retrieval, evaluations, monitoring, audit trails, hosting, and integration constraints.

Proof measurement

Adoption, quality, workflow speed, failure modes, manual work reduction, and production readiness.

Scale decision

Clear recommendation to harden, expand, pause, or redirect the AI implementation.

Choose the starting route

Start at the level of clarity the company already has.

AI consulting process questions

Questions companies ask before starting an AI consulting engagement.

How does an AI consulting engagement start?

A practical engagement starts with one business workflow, the owner of that workflow, available data sources, current bottlenecks, and a measurable result that would justify an MVP or proof of concept.

What happens before building an AI MVP?

Before building an AI MVP, the team defines users, data access, workflow scope, success metrics, risk boundaries, security constraints, and the production decision criteria.

How fast can a company validate an AI workflow?

The timeline depends on data access and scope, but the process is designed to reach a useful MVP or PoC signal quickly instead of starting with a broad transformation program.

Next step

Use one email to decide the right starting route.

Share the workflow, buyer role, data sources, constraints, target users, and what the first MVP should prove.